An official website of the European Union How do you know?      
European Commission logo
JRC Publications Repository Menu

Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) comparison of hydrogen delivery options within Europe

cover
Renewable hydrogen is expected to play an important role in European decarbonisation efforts. A previous JRC study showed that importing hydrogen from a location where renewable energy is cheaper can be more cost effective than producing it locally. However, the environmental impact of transporting large amounts of hydrogen over long distances has not been fully understood yet. Our work aims at advancing this field by comparing the life cycle environmental impacts of three options for delivering hydrogen from a distant location (i.e., hydrogen compression, liquefaction, and chemical bonding to other molecules) to on-site production via steam methane reforming (SMR) or electrolysis. Ammonia, liquid organic compounds, methanol, and synthetic natural gas were considered as potential hydrogen chemical carriers. The goal is to understand whether importing hydrogen could make sense from an environmental perspective, and if so, which is the option with the lowest impact among the environmental categories considered in this study. Impacts are assessed covering the delivery chain from hydrogen production, through its conversion into a suitable carrier for transportation (ships and pipelines are considered), to the supply of pure hydrogen to an industrial user. A distance (2 500 km) compatible with European territory, corresponding to a large delivery of hydrogen produced in Portugal and used in the Netherlands, and a timeframe extending beyond 2030 were considered. The Environmental Footprint (EF) impact assessment method of the European Commission (impact on 16 environmental categories summarized in a single score) was used for the assessment. Contrasting results are obtained for the different environmental impact categories considered: while all the delivery options would guarantee a supply of hydrogen with a lower global warming potential than on-site production via fossil fuels, producing hydrogen locally via SMR would generate lower impacts in 12 of the 16 environmental impact categories considered, including the use of natural resources such as water, land, and minerals and metals. When the overall environmental impact is expressed as a single score using the normalization and weighting factors of the EF impact assessment method, all the delivery options would guarantee an environmental advantage compared to on-site fossil-based productions (without carbon capture). Renewable liquid hydrogen transported by ship and compressed hydrogen transported by pipeline prove to be the most environmentally friendly options to deliver hydrogen for the 2 500-km distance considered in the assessment. The transportation efficiency advantage of packing hydrogen into more manageable carriers does not seem to translate in an environmental impact advantage. On the contrary, the energy required to pack the carrier at the hydrogen production site and unpack it at the delivery site significantly increase the impact with respect to the compressed and liquid hydrogen options. These results should be considered as preliminary. Much of the infrastructure for large scale hydrogen delivery does not yet exist, and therefore assumptions on technologies and emissions are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. More primary data on hydrogen technologies and emissions along the supply chain are necessary to increase the accuracy of our results.
Arrigoni, A., Dolci, F., Ortiz Cebolla, R., Weidner, E., D’agostini, T., Eynard, U., Santucci, V. and Mathieux, F., Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) comparison of hydrogen delivery options within Europe, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2024, doi:10.2760/5459, JRC137953.
2024-05-22
Publications Office of the European Union
JRC137953
978-92-68-16356-6 (online),   
1831-9424 (online),   
EUR 31941 EN,    OP KJ-NA-31-941-EN-N (online),   
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC137953,   
10.2760/5459 (online),   
Language Citation
NameCountryCityType
Datasets
IDTitlePublic URL
Dataset collections
IDAcronymTitlePublic URL
Scripts / source codes
DescriptionPublic URL
Additional supporting files
File nameDescriptionFile type 
Show metadata record  Copy citation url to clipboard  Download BibTeX
Items published in the JRC Publications Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Additional information: https://ec.europa.eu/info/legal-notice_en#copyright-notice